204 Ruger Vs 223 Ballistics Chart

204 Ruger Vs 223 Ballistics Chart – At 300 yards, we can expect the.204 ruger to drop 4.1”, while the.223 remington. The.204 ruger bullet has a balistic coefficient of 0.275 while.223 remington bullets have a ballistic coefficient of 0.395. Check out this one from bushnell. The.204 ruger was intended primarily for varmint rifles, which require bullets with flat trajectories but not much mass or kinetic energy.

The 223 is more readily. Ballistic charts may be impressive to. Let’s compare a 32 grain.204 ruger against a 55 grain.223 remington, both zeroed at 200 yards. For a beginner just getting into the world.

204 Ruger Vs 223 Ballistics Chart

I have both calibers and quite honestly prefer the 204 over the 223. It’s fast, but do the ballistic numbers for the.204 ruger measure up to its competition? Even though the 204 had the edge in velocity (26 vs 22 223), there was not much difference in drop and performance imo.

The.204 ruger is definitely a very accurate, low recoiling, and efficient cartridge. Below you’ll find several 204 ruger ballistics charts from a few. How the.204 ruger is right on.

Here is a copy of the hornady ballistics chart, it may help you decide. The 204 ruger is designed to fire 0.204” diameter bullets while the 223 rem will fire 0.224” bullets. The following caliber guides and ballistics tables linked to from this page provide comparisons of the most popular rifle and handgun cartridges based on bullet weight,.

The.204 was splitting the difference. Based off a standard 55gr bullet leaving the barrel at 3,215fps and follows the bullet trajectry all the way to 1000. .204 ruger (33 bt at 4225).185 +1.1 +1.0 1.5@150:

204 ruger ballistics table